185
submitted 1 year ago by meiko60@lemmy.sdf.org to c/steam@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sterben@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ye, but why? Probably some deals between the two companies.

When Microsoft - Activision deal will finalize, you can forget about that too.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

For a while it was Intel and ppc but similar graphics back end. Then it was Intel on both. But Mac had a special graphics back end. Now with Mac it's arm and proprietary graphics back end both. While they've been willing to put up with one or the other in the past. It's just not worth it to deal with both for such a small user base.

[-] Sterben@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and they can simply use Windows in a virtual machine anyway.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I've been in the games industry for 10 years, and worked for Fortune 500 companies before that. I can tell you that people assume there are a lot of "deals" between companies when realistically the companies aren't making deals with each other. Companies are still companies and attempt to make money off of the sources that they can.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
185 points (98.9% liked)

Steam

3 readers
23 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS