809
Howdy
(startrek.website)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
809 points (98.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5749 readers
168 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I’m sorry but he’s just not responsible, and your personal beliefs on gun safety aren’t enough to change the fact that he acted in a way consistent with the industry and his peers. Your personal opinion on gun safety doesn’t outweigh the U.S. justice system’s which has not convicted him of any wrong doing. I understand that you don’t like his political beliefs and you’d like to see him punished on that merit alone and will ignore the reality of the situation in order to apply your own made-up rules of responsibility onto him alone, but realistically speaking, he’s ultimately not at fault.
If I hear of anyone else accidentally shooting someone I'd have the same opinion towards them regardless of their politics. I don't care about his political beliefs at all. I probably agree with him on a lot of shit. It has no bearing on this situation. Honestly it's starting to sound like his political beliefs are why you're defending him so adamantly as this is the second time you've brought them up unprompted. I'm not making up rules. Pretty much everyone agrees on how guns should be handled safely. I don't care what the government says. You cannot dispute the fact that if he and anyone else handling that gun had checked it properly the woman would still be alive.
Your opinion being politically motivated is just the most logical conclusion anyone can make, since it’s not based on the facts of the matter or the reality of the situation. There were so many grossly negligent acts committed on that set that didn’t involve Alec Baldwin that go largely ignored by you and others who share your opinion, that the chance that you are making an honest, objective judgement of the situation are slim to none.
What have I said that was not factual? If he had checked the fucking gun then he would have found live rounds in it and not fired them into people.