189

I have to use a ton of regex in my new job (plz save me), and I use ChatGPT for all of it. My job would be 10x harder if it wasn't for ChatGPT. It provides extremely detailed examples and warns you of situations where the regex may not perform as expected. Seriously, try it out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

I’ve tried it and found it wanting at regex and excel formulas, but I’m glad to hear it’s working for you! Are you using 4? I haven’t tried that one and I hear it’s better.

[-] BenLloydPearson@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

I typically try 3.5 first and switch to 4 if the results aren't great. 3.5 typically handles basic use cases quite well, for example, writing regex that detects jira ticket naming nomenclature. For more complex things, I go to 4.

It sometimes gets things wrong, but I've also found that just saying "that didn't work" gets it to reevaluate for more complex situations

[-] varsock@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

it helps if you hold ChatGPTs hand and walk it through what you need. For example if you have a regex with 3 requirements, ask it to write a regex for the first requirement, then ask it to modify the previous output to add another requirement, and so on. that way you can sort of "audit" it as it generates the correct regex.

there is some more discussion of this in a similar post from a few days ago.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

So I was trying to write a regex for use with my ChatGPT discord bot. I wanted to trim off any final partial sentence at the end. I went around and around with it for a couple of hours because look ahead and look behind are just not something I do often enough.

It kept writing more and more complicated regex that didn’t work. The final solution, while not exactly perfect - it won’t keep a quote at the end of a sentence, and honorifics like Mr. and Dr. throw it - it wasn’t nearly as complicated as ChatGPT was making it. It still never did give me anything working - I just fucked around on regex101 until I got it right. As usual but having wasted 90 minutes or so.

[-] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

You can improve the reliability if you provide it test cases. You can now be the PM you wish you had for the robot that will eventually replace you.

[-] fraydabson@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Also curious. If I had some AI help with regex that would be awesome. But I felt as you said it wouldn’t work great without 4. Which I don’t have.

[-] tbonebrad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I agree, my regex experience was not great.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
189 points (95.2% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
158 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS