354
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] marcuse1w@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

What do you hope comes after it ?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Socialist phase where means of production are owned by the workers, and then communism.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You can have cooperatives right now.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

The problem there is getting the initial seed funding. Investors put money into companies because they want to have control over the company, and they can't do that with a cooperative. There is a systemic bias towards capitalist company structure because of that.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Investors want to make money above all. You can issue bonds with favorable interest rates as long as you have a solid business.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

The reality clearly demonstrates that investors don't bother investing in coops. You've obviously never actually tried to get investors to invest in a coop.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

No I haven't.

But I expect that the search for people who want to participate in an expanding cooperative is the bigger problem.

Do you know of a cooperative that wants to issue bonds?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

I recommend learning a bit about the subject before arguing about it. Cooperatives don't issue bonds because nobody is going to buy these bonds.

[-] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Or cooperatives don't issue bonds because they believe that nobody will buy them.

It's the perfect investment for people who don't want to participate in the usual capitalism.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Anarchist government, preferably communist in nature but mutualist works too.

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[-] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plenty if you study history and anthropology. How do you think humans lived for millenia before the invention of currency? You do realize thousands of years separate that from advent of trade and long after we settled down to form permanent communities?

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Nonsense. There is no returning to small-scale egalitarian societies. Large-scale societies are a trap; once you embrace them, you can never go back apart from in extreme isolation. Spend even 5 minutes thinking seriously about it and you will see why it's a pipe dream.

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

You don’t think there was any authority in those cultures?

[-] DocCrankenstein@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You think there is no authority in anarchist government? Have you ever read about horizontal-democracies?

Anarchist just means "against coercive authorities" namely "centralized and hierarchical governance"

You realize the fediverse that creates lemmy is an anarchist structure right?

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Generally anarchism does reject the idea of authority wholesale whilst also having no historical basis for it. Those societies were clearly in a very different place. I suggest you look into dialects as they will provide comprehensive explanations as to authority and its foundations (and why there are different conditions then than now) especially seeing as they fully had “coercive” authority. Now as to what non-coercive authority is, I don’t think even the anarchists have cracked that one

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
354 points (88.3% liked)

Memes

45739 readers
1145 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS