197
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

To add to what you've said, the classical economists can ultimately trace their economic theory back to Confucius via the physiocrats. The chain is Confucius -> Confucians during the early Han dynasty -> Francois Quesnay -> Adam Smith -> David Ricardo -> Karl Marx. Also, laissez-faire is just the physiocrats translating and applying wuwei to state involvement in economics. Wuwei, however, has far more application than laissez-faire and means different things depending on the Chinese school of philosophy (Confucian, Daoist, Legalist).

[-] Fishroot@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, laissez-faire is just the physiocrats translating and applying wuwei to state involvement in economics

This is kind of interesting

Because Laissez-faire vs State intervention was already a debate in Ancient Chinese empires.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourses_on_Salt_and_Iron

To the point of Daoism, it is kind of interesting that the ideology basically involved into Mohism, Legalism and Confucianism with the latter basically just out right copy the 2 formers. The case of Daoism fusing with Legalism (a kind of totalistic ideology) basically created Foucault's Panopticon

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
197 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13690 readers
268 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS