306
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bouh@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Did you have the game on a hdd or an ssd? That was a big technical problem of CP77. On an ssd it worked perfectly fine.

Bland, rushed and full of bugs is an exaggeration and very subjective. Starfield is worst on that aspect.

Again, look at steam ratings if you want to see an objective rating of the game since launch. CP77 had 20% of bad review despite the flaming even on media that never talked about a video game before, and that is since the first month of release. It's a bit early for starfield but current evaluation is at 28% of bad reviews.

Starfield has a worst launch than CP77. That is a hard fact.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Again, no it wasn't perfectly fine. Of course, I had it on an M2 drive. No amount of whitewashing can cover up the fact it was broken and unfinished on launch, and that's why there was such a well deserved backlash.

They promised things that simply weren't in the game. There were clear unfinished parts of the world, the story, and the gameplay.

Starfield is Skyrim in space. If you like that formula, great, you got Skyrim in space.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's not whitewashing when the statistics talk for themselves.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Saying something wasn't broken when it was, is whitewashing.

The statistics are that the majority of people were disappointed in the release.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Statistics from your ass. There's no more to talk if you deny the reality of things.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What are you talking about. It had a bad rating because it was received badly, what stats show that everyone loved it ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Shitty press rating, tell me more about it... Again, steam rating show CP77 better than starfield. At release both.

[-] drekly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

wtf has Starfield got to do with anything?

They both were received badly. Because they were both disappointing.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
306 points (95.5% liked)

Games

16806 readers
968 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS