-20

I've had a certain debate a few times where you might say we argue over the "semantics" of the meat industry.

I am what you would call a vegetarian. While vegetarians won't eat things that caused harm to produce, a vegan won't eat anything having to do with an animal. A lot of those who would fall under the latter category hate us because they say anything that remotely resembles someone enjoying an animal product is supporting the meat industry which then kills animals, which means merely eating an animal product makes someone a murderer.

Meanwhile, there's this concept many call piracy. It's the idea that, as the meme proverbially puts it, "you can download a car". The idea here, which I say in the way I do because there's still an ongoing debate about it, is that it affects nobody. But then there's the whole industry thing I mentioned. People on the other side of the debate often say "well what about the industry". I'm not sure where on the scale in this topic you might put me, but I feel like there's a glaring contradiction here. When it comes to animals, people think of the industry, but otherwise that's not a factor.

My question is... why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I am not sure I follow. So you are asking why people think of the meat industry as a whole but not the... piracy industry?

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

It was a very confusing post, and I don't know if this is what they're going for but MAYBE it's along the lines of

Lots of animals are born in farms --> people stop eating meat --> hurts farming industry --> those animals never come into existence

Lots of content created for industry --> people pirate --> hurts the music/film industry --> that content is never created

That's the only link I could find between the two ideas. As for what the argument is, I'm not sure

[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Kind of. People say an action regarding a product is only directly linked to an industry and the prosperity of the owner of a business when they care about the things involved.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

That's entirely wrong. Anyone saying the only actions taken regarding a product are tied to an industry or to make money isn't considering a large number of industries, charities, or religions. That's a major capitalistic take to the point of diluting any humanity in the creation of a product.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
-20 points (28.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43728 readers
1145 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS