94
submitted 1 year ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

nutritionfacts is run by a quack

[-] collinrs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The guy links to so many controlled, double-blind experiments. It's not like he is just making wild health claims out of nowhere. Why do you think he's a quack?

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

he often misinterprets the study, or claims it shows the exact opposite of what the researchers concluded. you shouldn't believe him just because he links to something: you need to read the actual literature and the body of work around it to understand the subject. he is an ideologue who will grasp onto any datapoint he can find that he believes supports his position.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
94 points (73.5% liked)

science

14595 readers
176 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS