316

As lawmakers around the world weigh bans of 'forever chemicals,” many manufacturers are pushing back, saying there often is no substitute.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

One of their uses is in firefighting chemical fires.

When an electric car is on fire, you need PFAS to stop the lithium fire. Water just can't stop it.

Of course, before batteries we used gasoline.

I imagine their might be more of these cases where modern technology relies on unsustainable practices.

[-] Vodik_VDK@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

TheConversation.com

Another factor that makes lithium-ion battery fires challenging to handle is oxygen generation. When the metal oxides in a battery’s cathode, or positively charged electrode, are heated, they decompose and release oxygen gas. Fires need oxygen to burn, so a battery that can create oxygen can sustain a fire.

Because of the electrolyte’s nature, a 20% increase in a lithium-ion battery’s temperature causes some unwanted chemical reactions to occur much faster, which releases excessive heat. This excess heat increases the battery temperature, which in turn speeds up the reactions. The increased battery temperature increases the reaction rate, creating a process called thermal runaway. When this happens, the temperature in a battery can rise from 212 F (100 C) to 1,800 F (1000 C) in a second.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Just because PFAS is one way doesn't mean there aren't other things that would work.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I really hope there are others. I haven't heard of alternatives yet.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Regulate it and the ev car manufacturers will spend the money to find one.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So for electrical fires, they use carbon dioxide to smother the fire and sodium bicarbonate to aid in putting it out, along with class c fire extinguishers. Class c are just carbon dioxide.

For chemical fires, carbon dioxide extinguishers are also used. They can use extinguishers with bromochlorodifluoromethane, aka Halon 1211, (which I guess could be a pfas chemical, but I don't find anything either way).

[-] Haywire@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Electrical fires don't generate their own oxygen.

[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Good thing a lithium fire isn't an electrical fire then, isn't it?

[-] Haywire@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know that it is a good thing. It just means you can't use baking soda to out it out.

[-] Kiwi@lemmy.fmhy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Well, normal electric fires don't but, as @Vodik_VDK@lemmy.world already quoted, lithium-ion battery fires do generate their own oxygen

[-] Haywire@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That was my point to. I guess I wasn't clear enough.

[-] Haywire@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't it just be better to cure cancer? Why don't the scientists just do that?

[-] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Sand. You use sand.

[-] Knightfox@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

The big one is airplane fires, AFFF is the best foam for putting out a jet fuel fire.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
316 points (96.7% liked)

News

23367 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS