231
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Awoo@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

The slide's authenticity was confirmed by a Navy spokesperson, who cautioned that it was not meant to be an in-depth analysis.

The slide shows that Chinese shipyards have a capacity of about 23.2 million tons compared to less than 100,000 tons in the U.S., making Chinese shipbuilding capacity more than 232 times greater than that of the U.S.

The slide also shows the "battle force composition" of the countries' two navies side-by-side, which includes "combatant ships, submarines, mine warfare ships, major amphibious ships, and large combat support auxiliary ships." The ONI estimated that China had 355 such naval vessels in 2020 while the U.S. had 296. The disparity is expected to continue to grow every five years until 2035, when China will have an estimated 475 naval ships compared to 305-317 U.S. ships.

Another section of the slide provides an estimate on the percentage each country allocates to naval production in its shipyards, with China garnering roughly 70% of its shipbuilding revenue from naval production, compared to about 95% of American shipbuilding revenue.

Because of China's centrally planned economy, the country is able to control labor costs and provide subsidies to its shipbuilding infrastructure, allowing the Chinese to outbid most competitors around the world and dominate the commercial shipping industry, Sadler said.

Alternative title - "Central planning is more efficient than markets" confirms US Navy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Redrum714@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That would require China’s military to not be a joke

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

remind me, what's the name of the USA's hypersonic missile?

[-] Redrum714@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The US has tons of ICBMs and has been testing the LRHW for a years now. Short range hypersonic missiles is cutting edge tech is extremely difficulty to use accurately. If you think China’s version is much of a threat to the US military I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

[-] panopticon@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ICBMs are a different class from hypersonics, you mediocre dunce

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Ableism? We can be more creative with our insults here

[-] panopticon@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah true, I'm at a pretty low level of consciousness today, I'm open to suggestions

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Me too, I'd just go for ignorant jackass or something

[-] panopticon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I apologize for the toxicity, I've edited in some funnier and less bigoted insults, if I've overlooked anything I'll edit that too. Good calls on your part, no disrespect intended. Except to that ignorant jackass, lol

[-] Redrum714@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Are you illiterate? They asked for a US hypersonic missile which an ICBM literally is. That’s why I specified “short range” in the next sentence you dumbfuck

[-] panopticon@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're terminally dense. A hypersonic missile is capable of high-G maneuvering and self propulsion in the terminal phase of flight. An ICBM is capable of neither of those things, you're just dead fucking wrong. Pack it up you donkey, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Propulsion system of Russian hypersonic missiles in the terminal phase: scramjets

Propulsion system of an ICBM warhead in the terminal phase: ???

Just give it up dipshit, be a grown up and take the L

[-] Redrum714@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

A hypersonic missile is literally what it’s called. A missile that can reach speeds over Mach 5. Arguing semantics just makes you look like a fucking idiot.

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Arguing semantics just makes you look like a fucking idiot.

exactly what you're doing by pretending people use "hypersonic missile" to refer to ballistic ICBMs, and it worked!

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

They are different things, do you really hate being wrong about little things like this so much you just cover your years and scream lalaalaalalaaa

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (76 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
231 points (100.0% liked)

news

23575 readers
984 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS