907
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 96 points 1 year ago

You don’t have to vote, don’t worry about voting. The voting, we got plenty of votes.

Why does it sound like he's got a mountain of fake ballots sitting in a warehouse that he's gonna drop from a blimp or some shit.

[-] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

I'm wondering if he doesn't really want to be President

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I honestly don't think he wanted to be president the first time. It would have made sense for him to make a big show of running, but lose, and just embrace the publicity.

Of course that assumes a level of foresight and planning that he hasn't demonstrated since, so it's hardly a firmly held belief.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I think he's much too fragile of ego to intentionally lose. I doubt he even let his kids win at games as children.

Partly because I doubt he ever actually played with them but also because he's a complete cunt.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Had he lost in 2016, I think he would have been secretly happy about it, but would have publicly griped about "stolen elections" and the like. Then, he would have gotten paid to go on talk shows and give speeches for 4 years about how the Democrats stole the election from him and how he could easily fix every problem facing America (without actually giving a single detail on what he'd do).

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I just don't feel that lines up with his behaviour anywhere else.

He has a pathological need to be seen as "best at everything" and will publicly say embarrassing, easily exposed lies.

He claimed he had the biggest inauguration. He claimed to be in incredible physical and mental health. He claimed the head of the boy scouts called to tell him "he gave the greatest speech they'd ever been given".

He took a sharpie to a hurricane map because he knows better than meteorologists. He told people to inject bleach because he knows better than experts in medical science. Butch manly men walk up to him crying tears of gratitude because they love him so much.

The "stolen election" excuse is another of these excuses. He can't admit he lost because only losers lose, so he started a lie that blamed anything except his personal failings.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Im sure he played plenty of games with Ivanka, all of them he learned from prostitutes.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

2016 was not the first time he ran. He had multiple presidential bids in previous election years, most of which amounted to nothing other than free publicity for him and a stroke of his own ego. He was never taken seriously and would always bow out after raking in some donations that he probably embezzled.

Then 2016 happened and suddenly everyone was taking him seriously this time. I really do believe he didn't expect to have a chance at winning against Hillary and that's the only reason he didn't bow out early in the race like he usually did. He was having fun shit-smearing the other Republican candidates live on stage at debates and must have thought nobody would actually vote for him. The look on his face when they announced the winner wasn't the look of someone overjoyed to have been elected President.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He needs to win. The crimes he's committed are obviously crimes, well documented, and he has gone right up to the line on publicly admitting this. The only way he stays out of jail is if he wins and pardons himself. Or if the hamberders block his heart in the next year.

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Covfefe logic. Simple as that.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because he has an IQ below room temperature and I'm talking Celsius.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
907 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS