29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)
traingang
22846 readers
22 users here now
Post as many train pictures as possible.
All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.
Home of train gang
:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:
Talk about supply chain issues here!
List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things
Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.
Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.
LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN
"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Well There's Your Anticommunism, a podcast about never learning any lessons, with liberals
Okay I just skipped to a random point in the episode and heard the line
like Jesus fucking Christ. And the amazing thing is, in literally the next line the guy points out the contradiction
Yeah, you would have fucking expected that since you're comparing them to the Gestapo - maybe the fact that they didn't do that ought to make you rethink your evaluation of these supposedly authoritarian and highly repressive socialist states, but no, you just move right on, no light bulbs going off in your head or anything, just
oh fuck off Alice
THE FUCK DOES THIS EVEN MEAN?? like, this isn't talking about Gorbachev's fuck ups or Khrushchev's reforms, it follows the previous quote so I guess "sustainability" is "not repressing people"? Like, this is what you're pointing to as the reason they collapsed, they were just too mean to their populace?
industrializing in like 20 years? massive increases in living standards? massively powerful industry? technological innovations? actually winning the Space Race despite what the Americans might say? um, sorry, that's not working apparently
yea, but no bananas though
it's one of my more controversial opinions here but I think Khrushchev's reforms were actually necesary he just fucked up the implementation
Yep, I think there were roughly 3 issues at play:
1.) Khrushchev’s implementation sucked and had a mix of good ideas and bad ideas.
2.) The bureaucratic structures in place from before him pushed back on any significant changes to how the economy was to be run. I think the Brezhnev era was in part a response to these attempts as Brezhnev largely just tried to keep things as they were (even though the Soviet economy desperately needed some changes).
3.) I believe a fully centrally planned socialist economy was not possible until the 1970s or maybe even the 1980s. Central planning is more efficient than the free market, but you need the computers and the math behind you. The 60s were a period where you reach a level of significant complexity in the economy but the computer tech and the math just wasn’t there yet to match the task.
leontief's models are pretty good and they're from the 30s but yeah the economic calculation problem was only recently solved with computers
There were many different policies and some of them were just decent while others were fundamentally malignant (and many in between).
How self-absorbed and attached at the hip to your own conservative upbringing do you have to be to talk like this jfc.