36
[Open Critic] The Lord of the Rings: Return to Moria Reviews (66%)
(opencritic.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)
Games
16689 readers
518 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That doesn't sit right with me.
Yeah, it's kind of messed up that I read a 66 as a stunningly negative response.
"Gave me a terminal disease." - 6/10
It helps me to think of it like school grades, where under 70% is a D and <60% is an F.
That's how I view it too. 60-70 is bad. 70-80 is average. 80-90 is good. 90-100 is great.
Under 60 is just varying degrees of terrible.
Games basically start at a 4/10 if they at least launch and are playable.
Vanity rating.
Think of it this way : should games that people pay money for be below average, ie, failures?
Anything below 60% shouldn't even see the light of day, really. Seen like this, it seems a lot more reasonable to me that 30% of released games would be below 70%. In fact, I'd say it's still way too many games that probably should still be in the oven.