152
submitted 1 year ago by darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This court case isn't about automatic firearms it's about semiautomatic firearms that exhibit listed features.

This particular rulling also is only about if the law should be enforced while a the trial regarding it's constitutionality ensues.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Then the headline is wrong because semi-auto firearms are not federally defined as assault weapons.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They're operating off of the CA definition in the headline.

To the best of my knowledge the only federal definition of the phrase 'assault weapon' came from the 1994 ban which ceased in 2004. And that targeted semiautomatic guns too as it was based off of California's.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the correction. I am dumb

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No problem, we all have our moments.

[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

They just like fucking with definitions.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
152 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
296 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS