-8

Fellow Lemmings, how to create Social Media that does not have mods? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am an anarchist, so the idea of the community doing all the work, creating content, and then mods basically ruling over them as a reward, just doesn't sit right with me.

We the users should collectively be in control of all our social media, economically and with regards of controling what goes on, on there.

All social media get's its value from the users i.e. the network effect. However the users are subjected to a hierachical place where individuals in power act as tyrants.

We create the value we should be in charge.

Fellow Lemmings how can we create social media were the users are king/queen?

post Scriptum: just having a voting mechanism, might be gamed by unsavory charcters or groups to game such a system, unless voting requires your clear name id, which comes with other issues of course.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We have to assume that the majority of users will not be disruptive unless driven by the environment. Otherwise we might as well stop right there.

Assuming that it follows that such moderation without any individual in power might still be implemented by reflecting the community will through some mechanism. So voting doesn't work as long as everybody can create a million bot accounts. Maybe there is a way to prevent that. Same with other approaches. I wouldn't be surprised if somebody can come up with a technical solution for this.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Traditionally, this is done by IP, but IP spoofing is a thing.

However, choosing not to allow duplicate or bot accounts is itself an administrative decision. It’s simply preemptive moderation.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

We have to assume that the majority of users will not be disruptive

That's a reasonable assumption, however it only takes a very small number of "bad actors" to do a disproportionately large amount of damage.

[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But the same assumption also means that one can rely on the majority of the users to be pro-social. Thus one can lean on this majority of angels to do the moderating.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023

-8 points (41.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26997 readers

1079 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.