166

I don't even agree with your shit how am I better at it than you. How are you gonna jerk off over the rules based societal order and then claim you can ignore whatever highest court you have because you personally disagree. mfer you just reinvented feudalism again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

it did effect the peasantry in that it changed the way the state worked and the kind of policies that could then happen. The barons being broken made enclosure easier later for example

[-] Vncredleader@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

True, true. But I think the person's point was more that it wasn't something peasants had a part in. In the process of Absolutism they didn't have skin in the game, it didn't change their daily lives. The end result was cataclysmic for them as a class, but they didn't think of themselves that way. They were, as Marx said, a sack of potatoes.

yeah the political machinations of the Tudors didn't directly involve the peasantry in the decision making process which was typical for feudal politics

[-] Vncredleader@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Peasants never get consulted. Its more that they didn't have much pressure one way or another. Compared to say the English Civil War in which they did influence the politics and their interests shaped events early on.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13545 readers
748 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS