114
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by grant@toast.ooo to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I've seen some comments about how "gitlab bad" or whatnot, why do people prefer Codeberg over GitLab?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] it_a_me@literature.cafe 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. Codeberg is fully open source(forgejo) while gitlab has an open source core+community edition but a source available propietary enterprize edition.

  2. Codeberg is a nonprofit with no ulterior motives. Gitlab is a publicly traded for profit entity with a goal to make profit

  3. This could just be me, but codeberg feels a lot more transparent. When they have outages, they explain why.

  4. Super minor, but the codeberg team "self-hosts" their own servers so you only need to trust the one entity rather than additionally trusting the server provider.

[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

self-hosting is great but that still means datacenter someplace. I've been using GitLab for some time now and CodeBerg "feels weird" to me. But then it could be my biases and "muscle memory". I'd say whatever feels right for you.

Unlike other big name Git hosting company who chose to use AI to "steal" from hosted projects other two did not stoop that low. So there's that.

[-] Helix@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

that still means datacenter someplace

no, you can also self host on your personal computer and simply mirror everything that you're throwing on Codeberg.

[-] Helix@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Codeberg is a nonprofit with no ulterior motives.

Well, their ulterior motive is to provide a service to the public.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
114 points (98.3% liked)

Open Source

31223 readers
305 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS