...one has to wonder what the latest Blinken round of visits to the Middle East was supposed to accomplish, since all it did was expose our impotence. Even the Financial Times could not hide that the meetings with Netanyahu and then Arab leaders were a train wreck. Netanyahu rejected even any itty bitty ceasefire, branded a humanitarian pause, to get relief in, demanding that Hamas release all hostages first. The fact that Israel has welched or underperformed on its past begrudging promises to let trucks from Egypt in, would make that a non-starter even before getting to Hamas being sure to stick to its position of wanting to trade hostages for Palestinian prisoners. And of course the Arab states are not about to budge. Blinken got a more pointed version of what he was told before.
Antony Blinken faced intense pressure from regional allies to facilitate an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, laying bare the stark gap between US support for Israel and the outrage in Arab capitals over the siege and bombardment of the strip….
Sameh Shoukry, the Egyptian foreign minister, demanded an unconditional ceasefire, a commitment that Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu bluntly rejected after meeting Blinken on Friday.
Blinken had been expected to “brainstorm” with Arab diplomats the future of Gaza, home to 2.3mn Palestinians, after the war ends. Safadi bluntly rejected those talks as premature. “How can we even entertain what will happen in Gaza when we do not know how Gaza will be left?” he asked Blinken. “Are we going to be talking about a wasteland? Are we talking about a whole population reduced to refugees?”
This comes off as the sort of thing someone who had just read classic texts on negotiating trying to put in practice: “Gee, let’s get a dialogue going! Let’s get to ‘Yes’ on some less fraught issues to pave the way for further agreement!” In addition, “brainstorming” is cringemakingly American. You don’t do that with people who are mad at you. You don’t do that in a crisis. Between independent entities, you do not do that at the top level. You have low level people or emissaries float ideas. So why this exercise? The worst is that Biden and Blinken come off as so disconnected from reality that they though they might get someone to accommodate US needs.
Friendly reminder: when commenting about a news event, especially something that just happened, please provide a source of some kind. While ideally this would be on nitter or archived, any source is preferable to none at all given.
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
The Country of the Week is still Lebanon! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.
You're going to have to (hex)bear with me on the update this week. Have you been feeling generally pretty terrible this last month or so? So have I, and doomscrolling and archiving it all is my quasi-job at this point. Not good, folks, more and more people are saying it. I'll get over it eventually.
Links and Stuff
The bulletins site is down.
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can.
Resources For Understanding The War
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Last week's discussion post.
What they say: "Support Ukraine for as long as it takes."
What it means: "Feed every Ukrainian into a meat grinder to serve our own interests."
What you see: A stamp commerating Ukraine hitting the Crimean Bridge.
What it means: Glorification of the terrorists who hit civilian infrastructure, barely damaging the military railway.
What they say
What it means
What they say: "Israel" has the right to defend itself
What it means: Zionists are entitled to subject Palestinians to apartheid and genocide.
Yeah. 100%. When they say defense they mean unlimited violent aggression against anyone they unilaterally decide is a threat. It's the Bush/Obama theory of defense
"War Department" -> "Defense Department" -> "We Totally Won't Bomb Innocent Brown People Cross-Our-Hearts-And-Hope-To-Die Department"???
Yeah. I had no problem saying "Israeli Defense Force" because anything that describes itself as a defense force isn't. It's like buying a vacuum from Honest Ron's Appliances. If he was honest he wouldn't put it in the sign. It's telling on yourself and revealing your true purpose and intentions.
Is this a gotcha? What do they think “any means” means?
Terrorism is when violence and violence is always bad. Non-violence and its consequences etc
Violence never being justified is a favorie liberal platitude of mine. It only takes seconds to think of historical scenarios where violence wasn't only justified, there wasn't even another choice.
It's truly absurd. Non-violence as an ideology and not one tactic amongst many has always been ridiculous. Lib favorite Gandhi literally said, in 1946 (!):
That's the end conclusion of non-violence. Just fucking die, no matter what the situation is. Never use violence. Insanity.
And even that Gandhi said his list of preferences were 1. non-violence, if people had the courage, 2. violent self-defense, 3. cowardice. I fucking love pointing that out to peacenik liberals who think Gandhi condemned all violence, at all times, in all circumstances, no matter what.
Imagine being even worse than that shitwad who told Jews to just go ahead and Holocaust themselves. That takes a pretty monumental effort, even if it's hidden by liberal status quo everyday reasoning.
libs are basically dogs trained to react angrily to certain words, 'terrorism' is one of them
What font are they using? This is too easy to parody
Appears to be either Titillium or Titillium Web Bold.
I used to collect fonts like they were stamps, I think that was one of the early indicators that I might be autistic.
That's pretty impressive.
Are you a web developer or graphic designer by any chance? If not, you could look into it.
Also very impressive that you recognised it so easily.
No, but I've been learning to draw.
The simulation is fucking with us
Me, after reading about fonts: Terrorism is left justified
Ok? Get the fuck over it fucking baby coward zionists
Palestinians have a right to defend themselves.
Gotta keep hammering on "massacred civilians" so people forget or don't learn that they massacred entire bases full of sleeping IDF soldiers that allegedly are supposed to be protecting those civilians.