57
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

Never make a loan with the Chinese government. They intentionally bankrupt you to "borrow" your asset (in many cases, important sea ports) for 99 years. They update that contract every year to lend it fir the next 99 years. You effectively gave away your asset to China forever.

That's also what the occupiers of China did to China itself before the end of WW2 – seize Chinese ports indefinitely.

[-] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's a fundamentally different problem here: it's new infrastructure, which in this day and age is barely profitable in terms of first-order effects (fees, fares, etc.) but is significantly profitable in terms of second- and third-order effects (economic growth, new businesses, yada yada).

If you could build a new subway in New York, spend zero capital, but have to give up the fare revenue for that subway, why wouldn't you?

Also, the India/US alternative is to... Just outright give the Indian Adani group a majority stake in their port expansion. So much better. So much. Truly.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22028 readers
92 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS