57
submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's a fundamentally different problem here: it's new infrastructure, which in this day and age is barely profitable in terms of first-order effects (fees, fares, etc.) but is significantly profitable in terms of second- and third-order effects (economic growth, new businesses, yada yada).

If you could build a new subway in New York, spend zero capital, but have to give up the fare revenue for that subway, why wouldn't you?

Also, the India/US alternative is to... Just outright give the Indian Adani group a majority stake in their port expansion. So much better. So much. Truly.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

World News

23049 readers
2 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS