80
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by pglpm@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml

A lot of debate today about "community" vs "corporate"-driven distributions. I (think I) understand the basic difference between the two, but what confuses me is when I read, for example:

...distro X is a community-driven distribution based on Ubuntu...

Now, from what I understand, Ubuntu is corporate-driven (Canonical). So in which sense is distro X above "community-driven", if it's based on Ubuntu? And more concretely: what would happen to distribution X if Canonical suddeny made Ubuntu closed-source? (Edit: from the nice explanations below, this example with Ubuntu is not fully realistic – but I hope you get my point.)

Possibly my question doesn't make full sense because I don't understand the whole topic. Apologies in that case – I'm here to learn. Cheers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] afb@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

The key is in the name. Whoever distributes the software to you determines whether it's commercial or community. Where they get it from is irrelevant because they're the ones distributing it to you.

Ubuntu can't be made closed-source because of the licensing of the software they use from upstream. Red Hat is still not closed source, for instance. Everyone who gets it gets access to the source code. But if Ubuntu went away or whatever then downstream distributions would be in a spot of trouble. They could rebase on Debian (which is what Ubuntu is based upon), but how hard that would be varies wildly depending on distro. Linux Mint already have a Debian edition, for instance. No problem there. Pop OS would certainly be able to make it work as well; they're a very professional operation. But take, for example, Endeavour OS. It's Arch with a graphical installer and some nice defaults. Without Arch Linux (which is almost certainly not going anywhere and is a community distro) they'd have some real problems. There's no upstream to Arch to rebase on. They'd have to so fundamentally change everything to accomodate a whole new base and packaging system that they'd basically be making a whole new distro.

[-] pglpm@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the explanations! Which are the "most upstream" community-based ones? From what I gather, Arch, Debian, OpenSUSE?

[-] KotoWhiskas@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

OpenSUSE is corporate- driven

[-] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I saw another reply called it a "company" indeed. I had no idea!

[-] afb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Off the top of my head, it'd be Debian, Arch, Void, and Gentoo. There are others that are debatable.

[-] 52fighters@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
[-] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm happy solus is coming back. I don't think there are any downstream distro and when solus 5 hits it will be downstream of serpent OS.

[-] afb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Perhaps fair, but since they're planning to move downstream of Serpent OS, they're not gonna be an independant distro for much longer and probably shouldn't count in the broader context of this thread.

I also didn't count a bunch of distros with atypical functionality (like NixOS, Alpine, Slackware, etc), just because they tend to have very particular usecases and maybe aren't well-suited as general recommendations if someone's looking for a typical Linux experience, but YMMV.

[-] kool_newt@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Not sure if any Suse would fit in there. I'd say more Arch, Debian, Slackware (is that a thing anymore?), Gentoo, Linux From Scratch if you count that as a distro.

[-] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

openSUSE is an odd mix because they have a very good relationship with SUSE and Tumbleweed and Leap have different hierarchies. As a result, openSUSE is both upstream, apart from, alongside, and a derivative of the corporate distro.

openSUSE Factory is where development happens that eventually becomes openSUSE and SUSE Enterprise Linux (snapshots of Factory make up Tumbleweed). SUSE stabilizes a core system for their corporate customers and shares those binaries (as of 15.3) and source with openSUSE for Leap. openSUSE maintains a larger number of backports packages that are shared with SUSE as as community supported software repo.

[-] kool_newt@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago
[-] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed! @NaN if you have any links or references where I can read more about this interesting relationship, feel free to share.(Cool username by the way.)

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
80 points (96.5% liked)

Linux

48335 readers
497 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS