45
So... how to fix this?
(i.ibb.co)
I was playing a game, alt-tabbing froze my system so I waited a bit and then rebooted by using the button on the case, since I couldn't do differently.
It now throws an error when mounting a drive: error mounting /dev/sdb1 at /media/user/local disk 1: unknown error when mounting (udisks-error-quark, 0)
This drive doesn't have anything I was using on it, since it's a media storage drive. I booted up Windows on my second drive and it can see and access this one without problems. How to fix?
It worked, thanks a lot! What would be the Linux alternative to do that?
There is none. NTFS is a filesystem you should only use if you need Windows compatibility anyways. Eventhough Linux natively supports it these days, it's still primarily a windows filesystem.
Oh, I see. So you're saying that, when I have the chance, I should move to a different filesysten and that would avoid me issues as the one in the OP?
If you're only using this filesystem on Linux anyways, absolutely.
Yes, I've basically moved permanently over to Linux and do 99.9% of the things on it. Had to boot Windows for the first time in days only to check whether or not my HDD died after I couldn't mount it
I'm still in the process of optimizing stuff around Linux (e.g. media drive filesystem) but I'll get there haha
You could use btrfs on Linux and install the windows driver. The Windows driver isn't what I would call stable but it will work if your mostly using Windows.
Another option is a windows virtual machine instead of dual booting. With a VM you could simple transfer files with magic wormhole or something similar
From what I've seen, that's a great way to corrupt your filesystem.
Nah, all Linux is good. I don't really need to use Win and since all my HDDs are for media storage I have no reason not to use them on Linux only. They're only mine and don't have to hop from PC to PC. Thanks for the input though
What do you mean by that?
FAT is older and has fewer features but it's better supported.
exFAT, not old school regular FAT.
FAT12 🤣
I tried formatting an external HDD and I picked FAT, I'll have to research whether or not that filesystem is good for my needs
ntfsfix but in my experience it doesn't really work if it can't mount the drive in the first place.
Guess I'll need to keep W10 around haha thanks again
If otherwise you don't plan to use windows on that machine anymore (on bare metal, a virtual machine is not relevant here), it would be better to transfer your data to a Linux native file system. Unless you have a solid preference, ext4 is a good choice.
Basically you just need to copy your files over, but you may need to do it in chunks (and resize the 2 partitions in every round) if you can't hold the files if the NTFS file system safely while you reformat it.
Also, if you want to keep attributes like file creation time and last modification time, that'll require a bit more copy parameters, if you want this let me know and I'll fill you in on the details.
What distro do you use by the way?
I'll keep it in mind, but since I'm getting new, bigger drives I think I'll just wait for and format them directly in the better filesystem. I tried formatting an external HDD and I think I could only pick FAT or NTSC (I'll double check), hopefully on the internal drives it will be different!
I'm on Pop!
If you're using gnome disks, it hides the more Linuxy file systems behind an 'Other' option.
Personally, for removable drives I prefer to use
If it's grayed out or you're getting errors try searching up 'how to format as [file system] in [Pop OS/Ubuntu/Linux]', you might need some extra packages.
Yeah, most options were greyed out. I'll have to visit the wiki of my distro haha thanks for the tips though
edit: actually, just checked, EXT4 isn't greyed out, but it says "internal disk for use with Linux only" and since it's an external/portable HDD I didn't pick that option
I'm pretty sure there's no difference between internal and external ext4 (at least how gnome disks handles it), so I think it's just trying to make sure users don't freak out when they format it as ext4 and think their data is all gone on Windows.
Also when it's grayed out you usually just have to install the fuse driver and file system tools, IIRC for exfat you install
exfat-fuseandexfatprogs.Can you reformat that drive as exFAT? That should remove NTFS as being a reason to keep Windoze around (and even if you do need Windoze, it should be able to read that format fine as well).
Yes, I just learned I can use a different filesystem to avoid (or at least minimize) these issues in future. I tried formatting a portable HDD and I could only pick FAT, that should be OK since I picked "Linux compatibility" or something like that in the format wizard!
If it's just the dirty flag (it was uncleanly unmounted) you can try
ntfsfix -d /dev/sdc1
Still probably better to boot into Windows and let it deal with it (ntfs tools are still reverse engineered stuff after all), and check journalctl before doing it, but it works in a pinch.