367
submitted 1 year ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/videos@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cricket98@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

So would you be okay outlawing abortions past the point of it being viable outside the womb? (assuming there is no threat to the mothers life)

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes. I would also hope to expand adoption/ward of the state options, particularly for this age. Maybe they could basically write that if the mother is giving up the baby at (let's just say 24 weeks), the state pays for the procedure to remove the child and care for them until they are able to be released home. That is a big expense but I think they do this a lot anyway.

But in this case, you would also want to line up an adoption. With many weeks of hospital care starting at 24 weeks, I feel like that would not be terribly difficult. I hope not. A lot of couples want kids but cannot have them. The new parents could take part in visiting the new baby at the hospital until it's time to bring them home.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
367 points (93.6% liked)

Videos

14311 readers
144 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS