50
US might end up preventing its companies from participating in RISCV development going forward. The proposal is as stupid as you'd expect. [pdf]
(selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov)
I remember my dad saying much the same thing back in the mid 90s. He was certain that RISC would destroy CISC because of the obvious benefits inherent in the design. Turns out markets don't always go for the best or most efficient solution, at least not right away.
Indeed, and I'm glad to see RISC finally vindicated. I've always thought it was a much more elegant architecture.