71

Charles Q. Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the Chinese leader would 'try to use other ways to do this.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

China's way of partnering is domination? Why are you projecting the European project onto your political enemies? Domination is how the North Atlantic has "partnered" with the rest of the world for the last 600 years. China is providing an alternative.

You think China doesn't believe in international law when that's essentially the only position it has been expressing and espousing for decades? Again, you're projecting. The USA has no interest in all countries being equal under international law. The USA is the scariest and most dangerous for world stability in the long run. Of the most bombed countries in the world, the US bombed the top 4 and all of them around China (Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam).

The USA has politicians like Condoleeza Rice saying that invading sovereign nations is a war crime when she was a major architect of the US invading Iraq. Many of the countries you're talking about are literally British construction. You think The Phillipines is named after someone who lives in that region? You think the borders of African nations are naturally straight?

It's fucking ridiculous how blind you are to the projection.

[-] marietta_man@yall.theatl.social -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Condoleeza Rice is not a politician; she has never run for any political office.

Also, you come off as a huge Chinese shill.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You have no idea what you're talking about. Rice was the US Secretary of State. You think the only politicians are elected officials? She was an active member of the Republican party and she held political power through the executive branch of the US government. Just because the manner of filling the office of Secretary of State is appointment and not election doesn't mean she's not a politician.

And if you think I'm a shill for China, when I have never been there, don't speak or read the language, and don't work in politics, international relations, international business, or journalism, then maybe you're a little too sensitive to anyone holding a position that opposes yours because your position is completely unexamined and is constructed entirely by Western propaganda.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

The aggressiveness with which you responded confirms my previous comment.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, because shills for foreign governments get aggressive instead of being trained on how to convince people of their positions ? You're delusional.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Actually yes, they do become aggressive. In fact they become overly aggressive, beyond what the situation calls for. Sort of like you, who goes immediately into ad hominem.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I went to ad hominem? I presented a position that opposed the commenter and the commenter accused me of being a shill for China. That is the literal definition of ad hominem.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry, but this is very obviously a scripted talking point. You are acting as an agent of the Chinese government.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

LOL. What it must be like for you to navigate the world. Scripted talking point my ass.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

You have nothing except personal attacks, which checks out.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You still haven't responded to my comment except to say I'm a shill using scripted talking points. That is a personal attack, it is literally ad hominem - against the man.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wrong. I’m afraid that you lack the skill to convince anyone here.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Says the person who's literal response was "wrong". You're fucking ridiculous.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

lol if you had a real argument, I’d respond. Disengaging, you’re being tedious.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

You have literally spent every comment in this thread saying nothing and you accuse me of tedium? Protect that psyche.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Get yourself checked for brainworms ASAP!

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
71 points (98.6% liked)

World News

32353 readers
597 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS