84
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kredditacc@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Can someone explains this map to me? The text says China leads, but the numbers say Vietnam is at 56.2%, greater than China's 40%.

[-] comfortablydumb@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's pretty obvious.. China is huge, Vietnam is tiny compared to it. The reforested area is, therefore, much larger in China.

[-] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Also vietnam is still recovering from the war I imagine

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago

It's hard to take care of the forest when there is still tons of inexploded murican ordnance in it.

That and the forests got fucked up by free and democratic chemical warfare. Badly.

[-] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

"Free and democratic chemical warfare"

That's good. I'm stealing that.

[-] Franfran2424@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

the forests are well recovered from the war. it was 50 years ago, and the monsoons really make growth relatively easy.

[-] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I stand corrected then.

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago

The map is the forest area in 2020, relative to existing forest area in 1990 (no change would be 0%).

So, if you count by absolute area, China leads, and if you count by relative area, Uruguay leads.

[-] NikkiB@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

It's forest added, not amount of forest

[-] Franfran2424@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

leads the increase

[-] jlyws123@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

You know Vietnam is a tropical country.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Franfran2424@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

much easier growth of tree coverage...

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
84 points (88.2% liked)

World News

2304 readers
122 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS