This is the best summary I could come up with:

It was scornful of the way private landlords had historically treated renters in this country, and said housing was a right and should stop being a "field of investment" that yielded high profits for a minority of landowners.

At the same time, there was strong growth around Australia in owner-building, made possible by the large number of prematurely subdivided blocks and vacant allotments that were sitting idle in major cities from the pre-war era.

According to the late Professor Patrick Troy, by the mid-1990s Australian governments were recreating the social conditions that had originally led to the demands for a national public housing program in the 1940s.

"Surely we need our tax system to enable opportunity for everyone to have secure access to one home before incentivising a minority to have many," former NSW Planning Minister, Rob Stokes, said at the at the same event.

And they said the private sector had repeatedly failed to build adequate housing for low-income groups in Australia, suggesting that governments should accept responsibility for doing so.

"The Commission considers that the housing of the people of the Commonwealth adequately, soundly, hygienically, and effectively, each according to his social and economic life is a national need, and, accordingly, should cease to be a field of investment yielding high profits," they concluded.

The original article contains 903 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!