122
submitted 1 year ago by iraq_lobster@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Other Threads instances will comply, and Meta can court big instances to use the extended Threads API, and you will see small instances to follow the flock.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Big instances would instantly lose every instance other than Meta's. Why would they ever do that? Especially when the biggest instances are mostly approaching Meta with caution if not already defederating?

The fediverse doesn't handle rogue actors all that well if they change the literal language used to communicate. It breaks it. Even Microsoft, the one who basically invented the strategy decided against it in the end. They broke the internet for a long while, but only because they were in a much stronger position than, say, Netscape, which was originally designed to fail anyway.

Meta would need to change the actual protocol if they wanted to get anywhere. Even then, instances can simply refuse to upgrade.

It is much more difficult than you think. And id much rather users see they can live without Threads than to force them into Meta's corner. I'd rather help people get away rather than ignore their existence. If Threads is too annoying overall, I'll vote defederate. But I want to see what happens first.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
122 points (92.4% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
613 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS