97
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IverCoder@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Transphobic comments

Intentionally silencing the truth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago
[-] PowerSeries@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Careful you don't come off as a sealion.

Though this is a thread about Wayland so eh.

[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This comic never made sense to me. She hates sea lions because they don't let people talk shit about them. Seems like she's the problem here in neo london where sapient sea lions live among us. They're here, get over it.

[-] Kindness@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

because they don’t let people talk shit about them

The manner in which you engage in dialogue is important.

Pretending to not understand another person's viewpoint, and annoying them into compliance, is arguing in bad faith. Arguments in bad faith are malicious deception.

Nobody wants to speak with sea lions because even if you explain in good faith, it won't amount to anything except your own frustration. A summary of the heart of the sea lion: Arguing with me is pointless. "And now that you're mad, you'll know better than to talk shit about sea lions."

Don't be a sea lion. You can protest opinions without being manipulative or rude about it.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

...do you actually think the sea lion understands why people hate sea lions?

None of this is in the comic.

[-] Kindness@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

They must, by definition. So yes. But for the sake of illustration, let's assume someone who acts like a sea lion isn't arguing in bad faith, but they aren't arguing in good faith either. Whether they and unintentionally annoying, or not, ultimately makes no difference to the people around them.

Let's say a specific oblivious person is combative and persistent. They are not truly trying to understand something, they just want to be right. You try to explain why their responses could be considered rude and prompt self reflection.

A) Will they evaluate themselves and realize what they are doing? B) Will they argue because they insist on being right?

The former is a rude person, but they are someone trying to figure out the world. Whether you engage with them or not, eventually they will realize their actions are causing disengagement. We're all trying to learn and become better versions of ourselves. This person made some mistakes, realizes it, then changes.

There is no point in engaging the latter. Their lack of self awareness is irrelevant to the outcome and your mental state. Leave them alone, and don't respond. If you do respond, and they realize they are wrong, but continue: they become a sea-lion if the fake politeness, and troll if they become inflammatory.

Don't feed the trolls. If they want to, "be right," they can be alone in thinking they're right, and you can get back to learning and bettering yourself.

None of this is in the comic.

No satirical comic literally explains the intent of the comic; intent must be inferred based on the events it depicts. Or you can search the internet, Know Your Meme attempts to track culture and context. Yay for them.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see, i didn't realize sea lioning was an established term before that.

[-] Kindness@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The point of the sea lion is persistent argument in bad faith.

The difference between, "prove your opinion," can be subtle in its difference from, "why do you think that?"

Insinuating someone is badgering and being maliciously dishonest, because they asked for context, is poor etiquette.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I'm absolutely team sea-lion here, did you read that comic?

I mean, just imagine if the sea-lion was a black person...

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Damn, imagine having to answer this question every time you say you don't like something.

Something tells me you don't ask this when people say they hate X.

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

By x you mean twitter? Maybe because its very clear and visible why its shit.

With Wayland, not so much. I don't see any issues with it either, so by asking someone who hates it, why. Maybe that person will mention something i didn't know yet and see their perspective.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago
[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well that's a weird thing to say then because there are enough people who dislike it and then people ask "why" all the time.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean yeah, it's obvious why X/twitter is shit, everyone has the exact same opinion about this.

Why would I ask about that when the answer is obvious? And why would I not ask when the answer isn't obvious?

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'm talking about the X windowing system.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's also plenty of obvious reasons to hate the X windowing system. Like that it's unmaintained and going the way of the dodo. Plus learning about a system that is old is less interesting than something that is new. I don't care about the ways a dead, unmaintained system sucks, so why would I ask?

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, thanks for proving my point.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your point being..?

If you wanted to know my opinions on X11, you could've just asked!

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Your point being…?

Read my first sentence at the beginning of this comment chain.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, and I explained why that was true, why would I be interested in comments about X being bad? Where does that go?

Your point seems like nonsense. Of course I don't ask about X. There's also a billion other things I don't ask about, because they're boring.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, thanks for proving my point.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Your point is... that I wouldn't ask about x...? why even bother writing that.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Re-read my comment 2 comments before this one.

[-] Communist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Still makes no sense, why would I ask about x? I also wouldn't ask about dos. This seems like a pointless observation.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
97 points (70.8% liked)

Linux

48376 readers
2060 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS