97
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IverCoder@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Transphobic comments

Intentionally silencing the truth

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol, if we start excluding tech based on the inventors mental illnesses we are gonna end up bashing rocks together to make fire.

Edit: To be clear, I am not saying that being trans is a mental illness, only refuting that mental illness is not a reason to discard ones contributions. Apologies for any offence.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago

let me tell you about the guy who invented bashing rocks together ...

[-] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago

Pretty much lol. RMS went off the deep end so no GNU, Torvalds used to call people devil cunts so no Linux kernel. Theo probably did something to upset somebody lol. Maybe we can just use TempleOS and become computing hermits?

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 47 points 1 year ago

Goes back further than that, Turing was gay, so anything building off his works must also be transitively gay.

To add to the modern examples, Reiser murdered his wife, which really puts "devil cunts" into perspective :D

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Goes back another 100 years before that. Lovelace was a woman, who in her time wasn't supposed to be doing anything at all

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aperson@beehaw.org 27 points 1 year ago

Well, using the same metrics would mean TempleOS is waaaaay out of the question.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

sigh, people suck.

This is actually something that bugs me about GitHub - I'm a Professional Software Developer, and we use GitHub enterprise internally at work (don't @ me, we don't have the budget to run our own infrastructure, BitBucket is crap and the sales person at GitLab ghosted me on 3 consecutive calls that we set up to discuss our needs). I'm also in charge of a team, and actively encourage the team to contribute to open source - find a bug? Draw up reproduction steps, report it upstream, and Fridays after lunch are dedicated to getting those bugs fixed. One of these days one of my team is going to run across one of these assholes, and I'm going to have a proper HR incident on my hands because that is a hostile work environment. Doesn't matter that it is a member of the public being a dick, I've got an obligation to ensure that my staff have a workplace free of harassment, and I've got absolutely no recourse against this other than to say "cool, we don't contribute to this repo anymore".

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

that is a hostile work environment

I understand your frustration. I go to GitHub für code, not for some weirdo's Telegram channel. But, come on, do your employees have access to the internet? Does someone maintain a Facebook page on the clock? Is Google allowed? Reasonable people can distinguish between workplace and internet hate.

[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Where I live at least, there is a difference because they are performing a task that they are being directed to perform as part of their job, as opposed to just randomly stumbling across hate while browsing the internet - if I've directed one of my staff to "submit a PR to this repo and work with the maintainers to get it merged" and some asshole drops into the comments they are being forced to engage in that situation, and that is not ok.

One case that I've heard of is a pizza delivery place that had to pay some serious compensation to a couple of their delivery people because they refused to stop accepting orders from someone who would be super abusive if their delivery person wasn't a white guy. Management knew what was happening, the drivers had complained and asked for a resolution, management had refused to do anything about it, so the business had to pay compensation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

Transphobia and such aside (which are shitty and unnecessary in their own right), how on earth can you realistically boycott Wayland when nearly every last Xorg dev has moved to Wayland permanently?

X11 is simply end of life, and there are no display server technologies or protocols that exist to challenge Wayland because no one cares enough to bother with the immesnse work it entails? At best you'll be stuck on a legacy distro for a few years until your display drivers become too out of date for whatever apps you use.

[-] WoefKat@lemmy.ml 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't really understand why people hate so much on transsexuality these days. Calling them a 'scourge' and 'mentally ill". What BS. Trans people are not hurting anyone. They just want to be their true self.

One of the arguments often used (also here) is that they are trying to force other people to be trans (in this case the poster says "they think everyone should get puberty blockers"). Which is complete BS, I have never met a trans person that wanted everyone else to be trans too.

It seems to be a big pet peeve of the extreme-right these days. I just don't understand why.

[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

They thrive of hating the weaker groups in society. If you want some morbid fun, try asking one of those what they should do with trans people if the had the power...

[-] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If they had to get mad at reality, there’d be a lot less to be mad about. Being mad about made-up BS is a way for them to have their cake and eat it too. It’s boogeymen all the way down.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

They want everyone to be cis, so obviously everyone else wants people to be in their groups too!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago

What a charming person, I would love to run him over with a steamroller.

spoilergayroller-2000

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] temeela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 year ago

I've filed a report to GitHub on this guy, I assume you did the same but ugh, people suck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

You want give some context here? We don't even know who is speaking in these screenshots, and to what end. Why would this even be a conversation?

[-] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Seems like some open source dev that responds to the "boycott wayland gist" and is against wayland.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

I remember back when I thought all FOSS was part of the FSF, and that itself was formed of hippie liberal progressives. Had a rude awakening when I found about the MIT vs GPL rift, and then another on HN when I realised half the people in software were just there to make money.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

I had a period where I didn't really understand the GPL or what it was trying to do. All I knew is that it was ""viral"" (whatever the hell that meant!) and that, supposedly, trying to use it would forever bind you and your creation to who knows what unforeseen legal horrors. I mean, look how long it is! It's frightening! I wanted absolutely nothing to do with it at first.

Then I got a clue and actually read it. It's quite straightforward. For almost all serves and purposes it's basically just MIT plus copyleft. All the legal density is just an effort to squash every conceivable loophole to the copyleft directive. I'm no longer afraid of it, I think it's pretty cool.

The thing I want to know now is why so many projects think their shit don't stink and that they need to pollute the FOSS ecosystem with their own stupid permissive license that is functionally identical to the MIT license.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unsurprising. I've seen a fair amount of people in the Linux community like this.

It's also quite hilarious to see them frothing at the mouth so much over Gnome getting some money to aid in accessibility improvements lol. Can't be having the less abled using computers now, can we?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] harry315@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[Completely unrelated to the content] How the heck is this post managing to crash two out of my three lemmy clients?

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago
[-] IverCoder@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Evil Wayland is making their app crash

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Maybe they don't support multiple images at once?

Make sure to report it 🤠

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] themusicman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] Cralder@feddit.nu 69 points 1 year ago

Someone is mad that GNOME got a 1 000 000 € grant from the government and is blaming trans people

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago

Wayland fixes VRR, mixed refresh rate display setups, screen tearing, X11 security bugs AND makes bigots mad? Sign me up! :-)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IverCoder@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the Windows emojis lol, I'm on a computer shop as I post this on lunch break

I would never have known if you hadn't told me. XD

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago

I dont understand, give context, who is binex-dsk and why should I care?

[-] long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

I'm actually pro LGTB and hate Wayland. Don't make us all look as conservative scumbags. Some of use just hate Red Hat (IBM) because of their big corp nature.

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

I dream of a future when people are not hostile to change.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
97 points (70.8% liked)

Linux

48334 readers
717 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS