497
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
497 points (86.9% liked)
Technology
59583 readers
2417 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
No, people need to start being creative and to make their own shit again.
No....you agree with him?
I mean no, it shouldn't be used to make any music, least of all shitty elevator music.
Who else should made elevator music then?
Actual human beings. Or just use music already made by people.
But why, I don't think any artist has ever thought:
"Creating elevator music is so fulfilling! I would never take a different job and express myself in unique and creative ways, bland repeating background noise music is my passion!"
Believe it or not, they do.
Like take hold music for example: the hold music you hear most of the time is actually called Opus No. 1 and was written by two teens in their garage in 1989, and when one of them went to work for Cisco ten years later, he offered it to them for their hotline. True facts, look it up.
Don't ask me how the hell I just know this shit. 🤦
Yeah, that's fair.
I mean, people are doing that. It's just that it'd be a hell of a lot cheaper to program an AI to be creative than to pay actual creative people.