167
submitted 1 year ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 3 points 11 months ago

If you're dicing things up that way, there's no middle class in the first place.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

:-) the middle class is the subset of the working class that has no food insecurity but has a lot of social & image insecurity

But like the rest of the working class, the middle class is one or two tragedies away from becoming homeless and marginalized, despite the lack of awareness regarding so

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 3 points 11 months ago

That's as good a definition as any I guess.

[-] satanicleftist@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

There never has been. You either sell your body and labour, or own enough capital for it to self sustain, or at least be sustained by the labour class.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 3 points 11 months ago

If we're doing Marx, don't forget the petite bourgeoisie, who draw significant income from both. They were minor in Marx's day, partly because very little was publicly traded, but they're actually the wealthiest group by far now, taken as a whole.

[-] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Exactly, you're either a part of the working class or capitalist class

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Of course there is no middle class!

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
167 points (81.0% liked)

Canada

7202 readers
417 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS