1066

raytracing rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 10 months ago by bbpolterGAYst@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 79 points 10 months ago

Getting the vibe that OP is being serious while using a template supposed to be ironic.

Seems odd to be angry about game graphics progressing. Imagine how it was during the 90s.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 22 points 10 months ago

And if they are serious it doesn't make sense, ray tracing, path tracing, global illumination, make a game leaps and bounds more enjoyable for me. Realistic lighting is everything, I cannot wait for the day they finally get the new global illumination system in star citizen...

[-] avater@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

i don't see the benefit of raytracing....

[-] Pixelologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Do you have a gpu that can run max raytracing at 1440p - 100+ fps?

I'm not saying it's a worthwile investment, but if you CAN run it well... you're going to.

[-] daellat@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

What gpu can actually run 100fps with rt on 1440p?

[-] avater@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes I did, still choosed to run games without raytracing on ultra without any upscale. Of course I did notice some (imho!) minor nice lighting and refraction stuff with raytracing, but for me these never justified the performance loss and the soft look of an upscaled image.

Therefore I'd rather choose not to play with raytracing and I don't have the feeling that I miss something :)