Fatah official: Oct. 7 is part of our ‘defensive war’ against Israel, Hamas is ‘part of our political and social fabric’ (www.timesofisrael.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Jibril Rajoub, secretary general of Fatah’s Central Committee, justifies the October 7 massacre by Hamas as an act “in the context of the defensive war our people are waging.”

In a speech he delivers in a meeting with journalists in Kuwait, Rajoub also says that Israel is responsible for causing October 7, due to its “aggression on all the Palestinian lands.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] gedaliyah@lemmy.world -10 points 1 year ago

Take your chauvinist, murder fetishistic, terrorist apologia back to infowars. They let you deny murdered babies and attack rape victims with impunity over there.

Even better, get some help, go touch grass. You are sick and need contact with other real life humans.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can't you just share the 'video evidence' to prove him wrong?

You're the one who said there was evidence, share it so we can all see without a doubt that you aren't full of shit. The fact that you're saying "there's evidence" then throw a hissy-fit when pressed to show it tells me that there isn't actually evidence and you're lying through your teeth.

The easy way to prove me wrong would be to share your evidence. Only a fool would take the word of reddit/lemmy comments at face value.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Get off the IDF kool aid and show me some evidence that rape happened. So far I'm seeing zero evidence of any rape yet you keep blabbering about it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just wanted to say thanks for removing the personal attack that ended this post previously! It got reported and I WOULD have removed it, but you did the right thing and removed it yourself.

Quick reminder to not attack other users.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah since the other commenter above me decidated an entire paragraph to insults towards me (actually, the entire comment is just insulting me there is no substance) I did add an ad-hom but decided it would be better without attacking him personally so I edited it out.

Please don't remove his comments though I'm waiting for him to respond with evidence.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I, too, am waiting for this 'video evidence' of rapes he's so certain about that he's willing to call someone "a special kind of disgusting" for claiming there's no proof.

This video evidence should clear everything up for everyone, unless he was lying.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

The burdon of proof lies with the one making claims. They aren't making any claims. They are only asking for evidence. Would you say the same thing to people questioning the (fake) justifications of war the US used to invade Iraq?

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023

55 points (85.7% liked)

World News

39129 readers

642 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.