379
submitted 1 year ago by bestnerd@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] moog@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

That's not how the definition of original works lol

[-] hswolf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, sure, the dictionary definition says "created directly and personally by a particular artist; not a copy or imitation", and I agree with that, but hear me out, I like these philosophical rabbit holes.

The definition says "not a copy or imitation", so we are presupposing that those things exist, so something original is the antithesis of a copy or imitation.

Now imagine if absolutely everything is original, wouldn't the word lose its meaning? Isn't something original the opposite of a copy? If no copies exist wouldn't it be the opposite of nothing? Or even itself?

Original things wouldn't be original, they would just be.

[-] moog@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

No, you're just overthinking it.

[-] hswolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

that was... the whole point... overthinking the meaning of something

[-] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

There's always a copycat

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
379 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1328 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS