402
'Stop the price-gouging’: Biden hits corporations
(www.cnbc.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
402 points (96.7% liked)
politics
19097 readers
1951 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Just remember that it's business. It should be boring. They raised your rate, it isn't worth that price to you, and be bored with asking them to process the cancellation.
If it is worth some price to you, they may offer you another deal. Know what you're willing to accept, but don't expect anything.
Also, you may be able to bypass all of this by checking to see if you can cancel from their app or website.
The problem with Internet service providers is that they are pretty much needed in the modern era and they are often monopolies.
For example, I have Spectrum. I use the Internet for light data items like posting on social media and checking email, but also heavier data uses like working from home and streaming videos.
If Spectrum decided that my monthly rate was going up by 100%, I could theoretically cancel my service, but I wouldn't have anywhere to go to. There are no other ISPs in the area. I work from home as a web developer and so can't be without Internet access.
Spectrum has me and they know it. Thanks to being a monopoly, the price isn't "whatever the customer will pay," it's "whatever the monopoly says it is."
Ah, but see, they're not a monopoly because you can get DSL or a 5G hotspot! Those are viable alternatives, right?
~ FCC
This is why I consider Starlink, despite being owned by Elon Musk, so important. It's creating competition in places where there is none, because it doesn't need to run cables which nobody wants to do.
You should check whether it's available in your area, and if it is, when you talk to Spectrum you know you have a backup, and can even say so.
Similarly, if their service isn't as fast as Starlink, you can say that as a reason for cancelling, and if you convince a bunch of neighbors to do the same, the landline isp may be inclined to upgrade the cables to try and get the business back.
Though really, we should have a government run satellite internet like Starlink as a 'base level' provider for all. Let companies compete and do better if they want business.
I've looked into satellite Internet before and it's typically slow speeds with low data caps for a lot of money.
I just checked StarLink's site and it doesn't look like much competition to cable Internet. The cost is $120 a month which is double what I'm currently paying. In addition, I would need to pay $600 for the equipment to connect to their service. Meanwhile, I get a free cable modem from Spectrum or can buy one for well under $100.
The speeds seem more reasonable than other satellite Internet providers, so there's at least that plus. I also couldn't find any data limits, which is good.
Still, that price point keeps it from being an effective competition to Spectrum. If Spectrum threatened to increase my rates to $80 a month, I couldn't exactly threaten to leave for a $120 a month (and $600 initial equipment cost) service.
[deleted]