302
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
302 points (99.3% liked)
politics
19127 readers
4409 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Watch Republicans argue that lead is good for kids.
The children yearn for the lead
It has what kids crave
It's got Electrolytes!
Nah. That's not the playbook.
Whenever kids (actual, post birth kids) need protecting, it's all about "who's going to pay" or "taxes are already high" or "but that will be really inconvenient to the ~~upper~~ middle class".
The best excuse I've heard for a bill that would protect kids from pedophiles was "the bill would unfairly target conservatives". I can't remember if this was a federal bill or a local bill but I remember it coming up and people saying "You're telling on yourself."
Yo, what??? 😂😂😂😂😂
I'd be interested to see map of lead pipe concentration vs one of political affiliation.
States with the most lead pipes, most at the top
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/states-with-the-most-lead-pipes
You're going to see a map of older areas, that is, urban cores and inner-ring suburbs. In other words, I don't think you're going to find the correlation you're probably hoping for.
To be fair, though, the official government line -- uh, until today, I guess -- is that lead water mains weren't actually a problem because of the large volume of water flowing through them relative to the rate of corrosion, unless you did something stupid (like the Republican governor-appointed emergency manager did to Flint) to cause them to corrode abnormally rapidly. Hopefully there isn't much of a widespread correlation between political affiliation and brain damage from exposure to lead via plumbing at all.
I'm pretty sure lead is what makes people conservatives. Look at when there was lead in things like paint and every car burned leaded gas.
Biologist here, it gives you adhd (60% chance), autism, and cerebellar Hypodysplasia (cant remember the incidence rate for these last two, but want to say CH is 8%). Child abuses causes conservativism lol, but lead causes developmental defects starting as early as the embryo.
Source: “Half of US Population Exposed to Adverse Lead Levels in Early Childhood,” Michael J. McFarland, Matt E. Hauer, Aaron Reuben. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, March 7, 2022. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2118631119
To believe what current US conservatives are claiming now, you have to be developmentally defective at this point.
Chicago proves you wrong. Chicago mandated lead pipes long after everyone else was phasing it out. They have high levels of violence now, often believed in part because of that lead, and they are known as a place where liberals have been in control for forever.
Chicago is not even in the top 25 most dangerous cities.
https://realestate.usnews.com/places/rankings/most-dangerous-places
You know what is though? Flint, Michigan. Sound familiar?
Flashbacks to watching republican politicians eat that pink goo filler crap they put into meat that was controversial for a minute.
This?
Reminder these kids are all adults now. Though they are about 60 years away from being politicians.
I had lead when I was a kid and I turned out just fine!
Eating lead paint chips made me the man I am today!