420
submitted 11 months ago by Toes@ani.social to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Implicit multiplication takes priority over explicit multiplication or division. 2(2+2) is not the same thing as 2*(2+2).

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Correct! 2(2+2) is a single term - subject to The Distributive Law - and 2x(2+2) is 2 terms. Those who added a multiply sign there have effectively flipped the (2+2) from being in the denominator to being in the numerator, hence the wrong answer.

But it's not called "implicit multiplication" - it's Terms and/or The Distributive Law which applies (and they're 2 separate rules, so you cannot lump them together as a single rule).

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
420 points (100.0% liked)

196

16416 readers
2142 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS