164

Epic explains why it hasn't sued Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft over 30% fee (www.gamesindustry.biz)

submitted 9 months ago by Goronmon@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ObiWanGurobi@feddit.de 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'll happily pay these 30% if it means I get quality services for them:

high speed download servers
reliable cloud saves
automatic, non intrusive updates
discussion forums
easy mod management
friend networking, multiplayer services
responsive and uncomplicated support

(using Steam as an example here)

People always act like those are to be taken as granted, but if you have ever worked in dev/devops, you would know that there's a lot of work maintaining each one of them.

Also, you can use these services for as long as you want, despite paying for them with a single one-time purchase.

Of course, if the platform doesn't provide any services or benefits, your point stands. In that case just avoid it.

[-] Rose@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Responsive support? On Steam?

Apart from the forums, Epic offer all those things and take only 12%. Microsoft offer most of those things and also take 12%.

Hosting a forums platform costs almost nothing. Moderating them like Valve, expecting the game creators to do the work and doing an extremely poor job, with each big game hub filled with toxicity and people earning points for racism and other forms of bigotry, is certainly not worth 18%.