554
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by mark@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

This makes me 😭

UPDATE: Thanks @nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de for this update: The issue has now been commented on and was closed by the maintainer, where they explained why those blocks would be nonsense. But it appears the OP wants to still talk with maintainer privately about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

What if account creation was local (e.g. Git and keys)?

If no data needs to be stored then no account is needed. Use the system where there is a unique indentifier based on the password.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Use the system where there is a unique indentifier based on the password.

Never heard of this, how does that work?

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A tripcode "is the hashed result of a password that allows one's identity to be recognized without storing any data about users. Entering a particular password will let one "sign" one's posts with the tripcode generated from that password. Trying to take another user's tripcode and compute their password from it (for instance, to make posts that appear to come from a particular person) is somewhat computationally difficult."

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's pretty cool, but still, does that really solve the bot problem? Doesn't it make it easier for them to spam?

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Tripcodes doesn't affect bots spamming at all.

No longer needing accounts removes whatever barrier to entry email, phone or credit card is worth. On the plus side less people are being farmed for data, so society is better off 😕

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

What I mean is, doesn’t that barrier being removed make things easier for bots as well? And while humans only save a bit of time once to register, bot farms would improve a lot considering they do it over and over again.

Less data farming is undeniably better, but imo if something helps bringing us further from the Dead Internet outcome I can accept it. Of course, just the bare necessities, sites that require you mail + phone + name and so on when they don’t need them to function should really dial it down.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Perhaps requiring government ID would prevent even more bots.. but stopping bots is not my priority. When reading YouTube comments I see obvious comments from bots making generic comments or asking people to click links, but I also see many comments that make me wonder if they are being sincere or this is ML generated. Unless you're going to ask for more and more personal data then only the side creating bots will advance in fooling those requirement. Barriers to entry do not appear to be a valid long-term strategy.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, requiring government IDs would basically solve the bot problem, but would make the internet a privacy hell, especially for nations like China which already struggle with it.

We need a middle ground, but it’s becoming increasingly harder to find one as you said.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
554 points (86.4% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
1794 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS