8
Librewolf but like... for chromium?
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
8 points (59.1% liked)
Privacy
32169 readers
457 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I would stick to librewolf. Supporting Chromium is not good for freedom.
Anyway, ungoogled chromium is probably the best answer. There also is Cromite which supports android and windows
looks like Cromite bad beacuse it has AdBlock plus instead of uBlock origin and uses google as a default search engine and includes the chrome web store
Please stop recommending proprietary software
no, do not mistake yourself. they are not proprietary blobs. the whole browser is proprietary. they release a tarball with the chromium code + some changes. but the whole UI which are the main changes are proprietary (after all, like any Chromium browser, it's mostly a re-skinned Chromium, they don't make any changes to the engine).
It's a proprietary browser. They just release a bunch of code for marketing purposes. Don't believe me? Try compiling it, and tell me if what you get is Vivaldi minus some blobs.
"Note that, of the three layers above, only the UI layer is closed-source. Roughly 92% of the browser’s code is open source coming from Chromium, 3% is open source coming from us, which leaves only 5% for our UI closed-source code."
Straight from the horses mouth. So 92% of it is the same as every other chromium browser. 3% is their oss code and 5% is closed source. That 5% more than actual open source browsers.
Which means the final product is closed source.
Excuse me? I switched to Manjaro with Xfce about 3 months ago, and if I wasn't high at the time and remember everything correctly, the default web browser was simply absent. Which is an excellent choice, in my opinion.
So, it's default for Cinnamon distribution. That's like saying Amazon AppStore is default for Android just because some manufacturers install it by default. Consider reading the article before quoting it, please.
I don't care about that, you said:
And it's not true.
It was set as default for Cinnamon distribution, which is not even maintained by Manjaro developers, it's a community managed distribution.
Wow, you're an idiot.
edit : and that's coming from spez so....