73
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 11 months ago

It's not $11 million in losses. The $11 million is the cost of (a) the food that you're reselling and (b) getting customers through the door. If it was real losses, they'd have known long before getting to $11 million and could've changed the deal. /If they had enough customers without putting the deal on, they wouldn't have put the deal on. Either way, now they get an opportunity to advertise their deal that is so good it will let customers eat more shrimp than they're paying for, so much that they could put the company out of business.

Have no fear, putting the $11 million in the loss column will be settled come tax time. And/or will be used to 'justify' taking a loan from the main shareholder's other company at 20% interest so that Red Lobster dividends on the shares held by the middle class don't exceed 6%.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
73 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
926 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS