540

submitted 11 months ago by Maven@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago

Ever look at it's resource usage? It's so bloated and resource heavy for nothing more than a chat client.

[-] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

I don't deny discord comes with bloat. But the idea that discord needs a "super expensive rig" seems a bit hyperbolic. If you can browse this site, your hardware can probably deal with discord.

[-] RTRedreovic@feddit.ch 4 points 11 months ago

I can understand that «super expensive» will have a different meaning for different regions but for me it is the case.

I am using the Thunder Client on Android with some optimizations. But its resource usage is not comparable to Discord at all.

Regardless, Libre platforms like Lemmy and Matrix allow me to use different clients if one is too heavy for me. This is not the case with Discord.

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, totally fair!

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I have a 12 year old CPU and I can flawlessly stream video while I play games to my chat group. Discord is doing petty good.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Well, I have 9 years old laptop and when I play something demanding like Valheim, or Risk of Rain 2 with my friends, I have to run Discord on my phone because otherwise I get either performance lags, or network lags, or both. May also be an issue with a shitty network bandwidth, but the phone and laptop are both connected to the same network.