78
submitted 11 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] makyo@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Well it's M for 'massively', right? I am not aware of any extraction shooter that could really be considered massively multiplayer.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

As an old school gamer, anything over 8 players is massive

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

MMO kind of implies that you’re online with everyone at once, at least in the overworld

[-] yesdogishere@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

poeple are bored shitless with fps style multiplayer games, and after that, bored shitless of crappy lead tier mmos likes WoW, NW, GW2 etc whose endgame is really shit. Compared to Champions of Regnum or DAOC, all the lead tiers are boring as hell. Zero endgame creativity -- the only thing that makes mmos worthwhile is solid endgame RvR open pvp. If ur mmo doe not have it, then you will perish like The Day Before.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
78 points (95.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
279 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS