1304
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A high quality version of the map can be found at the bottom of this PDF: https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2023-12/FY22%20CID%20Project%20Summaries-Map.pdf

And here's a screenshot of the high-res map: https://imgur.com/dHbLmXL

[-] Asifall@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Seems like still basically 0 high speed rail.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As someone who lives in Seattle, the high speed we'd be getting is great. It would go from Vancouver BC down to Portland. My guess is that there would be an ask for high speed to connect the bay area to portland in the future.

Edit: I'm not sure we'd even need it since it's pretty rural through the areas not high speed because there aren't a lot of stops.

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I've wanted that train route for decades now. PDX to BC in a few hours? Wonderful! If it had a stop within shouting distance of downtown in all three cities, stops within 10 mins of the airports (or even right at them) and a connection to the new line to Bellevue... Amazing.

That's a great spine to build a regional network on. Start putting light rail into all of the stations, local trams, and if you'd be nice to us on the east side, a interurban line to Spokane that would leave during the day. Bam! Cascadia is in great shape.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

a interurban line to Spokane

The hold up on that would probably be the mountains, there's a lot of mountains.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Have we built roads through those mountains?

[-] CCatMan@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago

Nah, get to Vegas fast

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 4 points 11 months ago

Someone is playing Ticket To Ride and going for that longest continuous route.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the made-for-human-eyes version. Sadly, I am not an ant, so I couldn't see the one from the article.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No Louisville → Etown → Bowling Green → Nashville connection is weird.

[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Leave it to the federal government to put the most informative piece at the END of the release, and then to botch that as well.

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
1304 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2503 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS