1744
submitted 9 months ago by kpw@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

You want something, but you don't want to pay the cost (either monetarily or because they have made it too hard) and so you take take it. Fuck these assholes companies who try to milk people for every last penny, so I have no moral qualms with piracy, I do it myself.

But, fuck, can we stop trying to paint it as some noble thing? Effectively zero pirates are doing it to perseve culture, instead it's fulfilling personal desire.

This is chaotic neutral at best, not neutral good.

[-] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 9 months ago

I think there's an exception to be made in your argument for abandonware. There are classic arcade games that wouldn,'t exist any more but are widely available due to MAME support.

[-] Apothecary@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

The Nintendo eShop shutdown is another example of preserving software through piracy.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

See also: The Despecialized Edition of the Star Wars Original Trilogy

[-] TunaLobster@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Internet archive, and a chunk of r/datahoarders, is built for that purpose. Just as people have saved old paintings (aka media) it's also good for us to save significant pieces of our current culture. Old VHS tapes and CDs are already disappearing. Sometimes finding something is just a little bit more difficult and it's only going to get worse.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago

I pirated plenty when I was young and poor, I'm pretty sure that helped form a desire for that sort of stuff which I pay for now.

I bet if I had abstained when I couldn't afford it, I wouldn't have spent the money on all the content I buy now

I believe the bulk of pirates are people who wouldn't have bought the content if they had to pay for it

It doesn't need to have been a noble goal to be a noble result.

For something to be actually and reliable preserved and win against random decay, data loss, disaster, and whatever else will statistically destroy copies, a thing will need to be stored by at least thousands of people. But there is no way to know how many, only that you increase the likelihood of perseveration by storing a copy.

I agree, most people are downloading a thing because they want it. But by keeping that thing, they are also preserving it.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

People who are doing porting work to make Windows-entwined Ubisoft games available on Linux are helping to preserve media for the future. People booting up Limewire are doing nothing.

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

I have a Spotify subscription that I still pay, but built a library full of FLACs on the side specifically because I got fed up with "right holders" taking songs in and out of my playlists and having the right to deny me access forever.

It literally would be cheaper and easier for me to just use Spotify.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
1744 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

57904 readers
4517 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS