481
submitted 9 months ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9405812

“We are going to do something that I will say is slightly controversial but it shouldn’t be. We are going to indemnify policemen and precincts and states and cities from being sued. We want them to do their job. Our police and law enforcement has to come back and they want to come back and they want to do their job. And we are going to indemnify them so they don’t lose their wife, their family, their pension, and their job. We are going to indemnify policemen and law enforcement. We are going to tell them to get out, we love you, do your job.” – Trump, speaking last night at the New York Young Republicans Club gala.

Trump going after the tyrant vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 128 points 9 months ago

Motherfucker wants a police state, but one he and his buddies are totally not accountable in, fuck this geriatric wannabe dictator.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 57 points 9 months ago

Of all the 60+ million people who intend to vote for him next year, this ridiculous rhwtoric will dissuade exactly none of them.

Meanwhile the left needs to be cajoled and won over and made to feel special just to get them to the fucking polling station.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 40 points 9 months ago

BuT BiDeN nEeDs To EaRn My VoTe!

If we manage to avoid a fascist takeover, it will be in spite of the naive progressive idealogues who think they have the privilege to vote their conscience.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

It's the political reality that you need the votes of people to your left who you hate. Get to it.

I'm already voting for Biden. You'll scream at me anyway because you don't want to treat voters you need as though you need their votes.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 12 points 9 months ago

people to your left who you hate

I don't hate them. I said certain ones are naive (aggravatingly so, to clarify further). Too many people talk and act as if they can choose this time and keep that ability to choose next time.

If you have the sense to see what you stand to lose in this dumb FPTP system, then we are in the same boat. I understand the desire to have your elected leaders actually do something progressive, or doing something that makes you truly proud of them.

But as someone said, voting is a chess move, not a love letter.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I don’t hate them. I said certain ones are naive (aggravatingly so, to clarify further). Too many people talk and act as if they can choose this time and keep that ability to choose next time.

in the time that I've been voting... the US has only slid right. The democrats have done exceedingly little to halt that.

Rear guard delaying actions, to use the military parlance, do not win wars. Biden is moderate only in consideration that the GOP are so much further to the right as to actively embrace fascism. We cannot keep acting as we always have and expect something to magically fix itself. So now is the time to start changing how we vote and the people we send to be voted for.

it's really that simple.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

It's not. We are four years too late. We need to prevent a fascist takeover, then try to make progress.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

That is what they said last time, too. Complete with a promise of “one term”

Why should anyone believe you (and Biden) this time?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

That is what they said last time, too. Complete with a promise of “one term”

Why should anyone believe you (and Biden) this time?

What alternative do you have? What viable plan can you enact to change the likely outcome and still avoid fascism?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

And the time before that, and the time before that….. it’s literally what they say every four years.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't know about that, I've been paying attention since 2004ish and I don't remember Romney being portrayed as a destroyer of democracy, his big thing was "binders of women" and tying his dog to the roof of his car... Lol Same with McCain, our biggest issue with McCain was Palin and the absolute joke of a person she is with all the newspapers she definitely totally reads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I don’t hate them.

Don't lie to me. I know how you've responded to me in the past when I didn't include that I was voting for Biden in my comment.

I understand the desire to have your elected leaders actually do something progressive, or doing something that makes you truly proud of them.

I very much doubt that.

But as someone said, voting is a chess move, not a love letter.

And the move expected of the progressives you hate is always "forfeit."

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And you need the votes of people to your right who you hate. That's the political reality of it. It's a two way street, and both progressives and moderates see it as a one way.

I get to see that a lot because I have the same goals and desires of progressives (which is why I consider myself one), but I think we should achieve them with plans grounded in reality that are based on systems and practices we already know work. That aligns more with how the moderates do things. In short, I just want to reach the outcome in the best way possible, without any unpleasant surprises.

I expect something snarky in response to that, but I hope I'm wrong. Because as much as you may dislike me I'm the vote, directly to your right, that you need. Do you believe your words to apply fairly to everyone, or just the groups you dislike?

Edit: And just to be clear, I really see no reason for us to be adversarial. I want the same goals as you at the end of the day, and given you're voting for Biden, I think our thoughts on the methods aren't all that different either.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

And you need the votes of people to your right who you hate.

The party has you covered. They have spent the past half a century moving to the right to appeal to the centrists and try, Chamberlain-like, to appease Republicans. If the party ever does something that its pampered right flank dislikes in the slightest, then I'll start talking about how we need to keep their votes.

The last time that happened was when the voters overcame the party's attempt to coronate Clinton and nominated Obama instead. The Clinton wing of the party formed a PAC to try to elect McCain and Palin. Obama, always eager to capitulate to his right, actually tried to get their votes back by selecting a moderate as his VP pick. Clinton selected the anti-choice Tim Kaine as her VP pick as a "fuck you, you'll vote for me cause you gotta" to the left. Biden chose the war on drugs DA as his VP.

Because as much as you may dislike me I’m the vote, directly to your right, that you need. Do you believe your words to apply fairly to everyone, or just the groups you dislike?

The party does what you want already. You have a party that represents you. The left has a party that opposes them and orders them to vote for them anyway.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

look, you can say what you want about progressives. Just know, I think you believe you have the privilege of dictating who I vote for... which is not democracy, and you can go fuck off with trump (who, believe it or not, shares that belief.)

You want people to vote for your candidate? you should maybe not piss them off first. Besides which, right now, it's the primary and not even about Biden vs Trump. for the DNC, it's a question of which candidate is the best.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Interestingly enough, the DNC is actively subverting the primary elections in every state they can. They don’t want primary elections because they know how incredibly unpopular Biden is, and yet they insist he is the only one who can beat Trump. I disagree emphatically - Biden is the only one who can lose to him, and we are hurtling towards that terrible outcome due to corrupt establishment politics.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Well, I wouldn't say Biden is the only one who can loose.... There's others right up there with him in that. but those ones are all basically the same, so I don't know that it makes all that much in difference.

I wouldn't be surprised to find they've always meddled and outright cheated in primaries to keep progressives out.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah I suspect there is a long and storied history of this happening. If there’s one thing all the corporate shills in DC can agree on, it’s that progressives represent a threat to their very way of life. Imagine, politicians who would fight for regular people, instead of corporate interests. O, the humanity…

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Get better messaging, then. Screaming at them ain't gonna work.

Scream at me for pointing it out. It beats trying to get votes.

(I'm voting for Biden. "Not Trump" has convinced me. It won't convince all the voters you'll need to win, and you'd rather lose than stop punching left.)

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It seems like it convinced enough last time around.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

In concert with campaign promises that haven't borne fruit, mainly due to Democrats getting in their own way. Now we're down to just "not Trump". I think relying on that message alone is doomed to fail. If you don't think we need better messaging or even additional messaging, fine.

But don't blame people to whom you are hostile when they don't enthusiastically vote like you want.

[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Imagine being upset that your candidate has to actually have good policy proposals that voters support in order to get votes.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I mean, I feel like most people are pretty upset about it. I'm pretty upset I have to vote for Biden in order to vote against Trump, but I'm still gonna do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

It's easy, the Right are fanatics doing fanatic things, the Left haven't had something to be "fanatical" about since Obama, Biden has done a great job for the most part, obviously with some disappointment here and there, no presidency is perfect, but Old man Biden just doesn't excite people, and it's only Trump keeping him running, if Don the Con would go to prison and stop running we'd be able to hopefully elect somebody under 60, and most of those Republican candidates are just as scary as Trump, and bless Chris Christie and Liz Chaney for finally committing political suicide by fighting against the fascism in their party, especially after enabling it for so long.

[-] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

And only when it was no longer going to benefit them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
481 points (95.5% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3467 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS