41
submitted 11 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

It's just too bad there's no word in the English language for a situation that's worse than a stalemate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago

This is all so much confusing and anger-inducing. I get the headaches of strategy though, so many layers to this. Part of me thinks that Russia should go on a true offensive soon if Ukraine doesn't agree to a peace deal, but that might backfire and inspire the Amerikkkan and UkraNazi imperialists to add some money from the U.S. black budget and begin to throw more hordes of bad guys at Russia, economic stability be damned.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Exactly, it's a fine balancing act where Russia doesn't want NATO to provoke a major escalation with NATO, and they're just dragging out a war of attrition because it's working in their favor. A big offensive would also be a lot more costly, so I really think that the plan is to just slowly keep ramping up pressure until Ukrainian army starts to collapse.

Mearsheimer had a pretty good analysis of the situation in my opinion. He points out that vast majority of casualties in the war come from artillery and Russia enjoys a massive artillery advantage over Ukraine. So, attrition ratio favors Russia in a big way.

Experienced and motivated soldiers are the core that holds Ukrainian army together. And as these soldiers are lost and replaced with new conscripts who lack experience and motivation the army effectiveness keeps decreasing. Eventually it will hit an inflection point where it's simply not capable of holding the line.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
41 points (95.6% liked)

World News

2310 readers
112 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS