0
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Awoo@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Worth noting that the Chinese ambassador also called it the Malvinas throughout, not the Falklands.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they have claim to the islands because they fucking live there dude

because i'm sensing a "you're just a british nationalist" coming in the immediate future, i'll just make my position clear
if the islanders decided that they would rather be argentinian, i would wholeheartedly support argentina's claim to the islands

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

This. People first. Peoples right to self determination and democracy from top to bottom in society is paramount. As communists, that principle is absolute.

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're acting like the Argentinian government is gonna massacre them the second power is transferred. Probably nothing would change but Argentina would get the profit from oil and tourism.

Like Argentinians are not on average wealthy people. The British people living on those islands probably have it way better than most of the people in Argentina. It's kind of gross.

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Humans don't exist to create profit for the Argentinian government.

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

lol idealist nonsense. Argentinians would see more wealth from owning the islands than they do now.

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Idealist nonsense, says the person who wants to divide up all natural resources equally into amorphous national state boundaries regardless of the wishes of the people who live there, until all national states have equal populations, areas, and access to natural wealth?

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

You're literally just spewing more idealist nonsense. You know that countries are a thing that still exist right? Either Argentina gets to benefit from the islands, or Britain (lmao) does. You're saying the British should benefit because they colonized some islands hundreds of years ago and there's a couple thousand people there. If there was 1 person living in the Falklands, would that justify oil and gas drilling and a British military outpost?

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

yes, because people matter more than realpolitik shit

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

Apparently poor Argentinians who could benefit from social program funding don't matter, but white British people living in a colonial outpost do.

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

people who live in a place when they have not displaced a native population do matter more than a random government who are pursuing an imperial claim from their former imperial masters yes

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Or maybe (radical, I know, wow), people matter equally, and we shouldn't forcibly deport or integrate them into various countries due to arbitrary vibes?

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

When did anyone say anything about deporting people?

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, my bad, you're going with "forcibly integrating".

[-] blobjim@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

lmao are y'all trying to do a "reverse colonialism" thing? Literally the only thing that would likely change is who they pay taxes to and where they get there food from (shipped from Argentina probably instead of shipped 7,000 miles).

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

it isn't "reverse colonialism" it's just colonialism

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

news

23571 readers
688 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS