55
submitted 11 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

it's probably worth noting that even the court whose verdict this overturned agreed with the basic premise that Trump engaged in conduct that constitutes an insurrection--their ruling was merely that, on a technicality, he did not qualify as an officer of the United States (a legal term with a specific, vague meaning in the Constitution). there really is not a dispute that what he did was unlawful conduct, only whether that carries the penalty in question (being unable to legally run for office in a number of states)

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10179 readers
170 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS